Saturday, February 16, 2013

Minnesota Democrats pushing gun confiscation bill similar to Missouri's

This is the new template for individual states, the latest tactic cooked up by the Democrat anti-gun liberty haters, based on the California model. California's Democrat "Super-Majority" is also floating gun confiscation of a specific kind: They have already confiscated previously registered guns (Specifically Simonov pattern Carbines capable of using detachable magazines. See the video posted on the sidebar of this blog!). Now they want all firearms that accept detachable mags banned/confiscated, which is 99.5% of ALL firearms in existence!...Here we see the REAL intent behind the resurfacing of all these old anti-gun bills: Total Confiscation!.  The very thing the Pro-Gun forces have warned of and fought against for years!.  In New York, the Democrats "begged" that their confiscation bill not be revealed to the public, particularly in wake of the flawed anti-gun package arm-twisted by Governor "CuoM-ussolini". Now we see Missouri and Minnesota  following suit, willingly goose-stepping into crushing the people and Constitution they have sworn a sacred oath to serve. Politically incorrect comment ahead: Those who are Godless heathen communist lovers consider taking an oath under God null and void. They laugh when they take that oath, knowing it is a doorway to their psychopathic voyage to power over the people!.  One thing this latest propaganda war against guns & gun-owners has shown: The naked face of tyranny the Maoist/Alinsky radical socialists hiding in suits has in for the "little people"...Registration, confiscation, extermination: The same old formula after declaring gun owners, via media propaganda, such as we see happening now,  De Facto "enemies of the state"...(S9)
The measure uses language that is almost identical to the Missouri proposal, including a requirement that law-abiding gun owners relinquish their so-called "assault" weapons...

anyone who, on February 1, 2013, legally owns or is in possession of an assault weapon has until September 1, 2013, to do any of the following without being subject to prosecution under Minnesota Statutes, section 624.7133:
  1. remove the weapon from the state;
  2. surrender the weapon to a law enforcement agency for destruction;
  3. render the weapon permanently inoperable; or
  4. if eligible, register the weapon as provided in Minnesota Statutes, section 624.7133, subdivision 5.
The rule would also apply to anyone who receives the weapon as an inheritance.
Anyone who owns a gun classified as an "assault weapon" prior to the Feb. 1, 2013 cutoff may keep the weapon provided that the owner registers it, submits to a background check, keeps the weapon locked up and submits to an inspection by authorities. Owners of such weapons would be required to renew the registration annually....
One more thing, very significant in this context: "Democrats walked out of a hearing when two firearms experts appeared to explain that the proposal "would outlaw only a gun’s cosmetic features while not affecting the functionality of the firearms"...
Full Story can be found HERE

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.